Fourth Sunday after the Epiphany (Year 4, NL)
23 results found.
The Samaritan woman vs. our assumptions (John 4:5-42)
She doesn’t even have a name. Surely she is a questionable character if she has no name.
March 12, Lent 3A (Exodus 17:1-7; Psalm 95; John 4:5-42)
Water dominated the imaginations of our ancestors in faith, whose stories often called for either a canteen or galoshes.
Gratitude, need, and desire
These three stances toward God are the beginning of faith.
A barbershop births a church of drug users, ex-cons, and homeless folks
Others have given up on them, but not God.
A prophetic ministry of relationship
Jesus in conversation with three women in the Gospels
Living water isn’t just a metaphor
On the cross, Jesus needed actual water. No one gave him any.
A pilgrimage of Virginia Woolf readers
Walking together through Sussex and To The Lighthouse.
Women of the Bible say #MeToo
Read Tamar or Dinah's story with your church. Listen together for their cries.
Reading the Bible as a feminist
From creation to Mary Magdalene, Barbara E. Reid offers convincing alternatives to sexist interpretations of scripture.
by Julie Morris
Ordinary water, ordinary food (John 4:5-42)
How do we wrap our minds around hunger?
Christ and the Woman of Samaria at the Well, by Guercino
The mystery of marriage: Secrets of joined lives
No one from the outside can fully grasp the inner workings of any marriage. Even those inside sometimes find themselves lonely and strangers.
Sunday, March 23, 2014: John 4:5-42
Jesus chooses a circumstance of division, then instigates community.
Journey of light: LA’s Our Lady of the Angels
When you pray at LA's cathedral, you are part of humanity past, future and in the inglorious, unromanticized present.
Identity confirmation: John 4:5-42
Respectable women made their trips to the well in the morning, not at noon.
Spiritual snobs: Exodus 17:1-7; Psalm 95; John 4:5-42
It is tempting to sit in judgment on others. Sometimes we do it in jest, as Mark Twain did when commenting on Adam. “Adam was but human—this explains it all. He did not want the apple for the apple’s sake, he wanted it only because it was forbidden. The mistake was in not forbidding the serpent; then he would have eaten the serpent.” But sometimes the serpent eats us, and then we judge in earnest.