October 6, Ordinary 27B (Job 1:1, 2:1–10)
The primary biblical text that addresses human suffering is a comedic folktale. How are we meant to process this?
Does anyone think writing the book of Job was a good idea? Or that adding it to the biblical canon really helped solve the theodicy problem? Even if it is a literary masterpiece, at face value a story in which YHWH abandons the most honest, upright, and faithful man in the world to Satan’s ministrations is a risky gambit. And if the entire gambit is simply a platform to explore matters of divine justice and assert God’s bigness—while never providing a direct answer to the question of evil and suffering—is this really sacred text material? Or would it work better reformatted into a couple of entertaining episodes of Good Omens?
On my shelf is a mass-market copy of Robert Heinlein’s 1984 novel Job. In it Alex, a Christian political analyst, endures a series of unfortunate events brought about by Loki (with God’s permission, of course), the sci-fi element occurring as Alex shifts from one alternate reality to another, always at just the wrong time. Heinlein’s novel is a tremendously witty and entertaining take on the misfortunes of Job, but it’s the subtitle that has stuck with me: “A Comedy of Justice.” Although the book of Job is an alternate reality consideration of God’s justice, there’s a not inconsequential aspect of it that is comedic, in the classic sense of the word. Misfortune after misfortune stacks up, not the least of which is the unrelenting cycle of speeches by Job’s misunderstanding friends, and just like in any good comedy, in the end Job prospers more than he did before. All’s well that ends well, right?
The book does introduce itself as a folktale: “There was once a man in the land of Uz whose name was Job.” This introduction clues us into the book’s nonliteral genre. The genre also forces certain motifs. It’s set in a strange land, at a distant time, with a supernatural adversary. Good and evil are starkly contrasted and personified. In the end a reversal of fortunes returns everything as it was. It is thus not out-of-bounds to prioritize homiletic attention to matters of genre. Given the nature of most of the other books collected in scripture, how are we intended to process a comedic folktale as the primary biblical text that addresses the matter of human suffering?
