A Response to Amanda Marcotte on religion’s death throes

November 30, 2011

Amanda Marcotte got the memo. Religion in America is dying, and the religion of bigotry is finding it hard to maintain its followership.

We liberal protestants have known institutional decline for about
forty years.  Since Sgt. Pepper’s and Vietnam, our communities have
slowly been devastated by all sorts of economic and social forces.

But it’s not the old order.  The old order she refers to is young. 
It arose in reaction to liberal Protestantism’s social victories,
especially around race.  Once, fundamentalism was considered by the
elites a backwater worldview held by hicks and southerners.  Its
theology was historically condemned by the church Catholic.  But after
race was confronted institutionally in private schools by the federal
goverment, Ralph Reed and his associates organized conservative churches
into their current political force as a cohesive wing in the Republican
Party.  Like Amanda, I look forward to its self-destruction.

Overall, however, I’m not as sanguine about what a godless country
means.    For the American religion has also been diverse, sometimes
thinly held, and pragmatic.  In particular, I’m thankful for liberal
Protestantism, once a powerful part of American politics.

For at the Ohio Wesleyan Conference
in March, 1942,  the Federal Council of Churches created the moral
framework for the United Nations, the Marshall Plan, decolonization, and
civil rights.   It’s leaders included industrialists, policy makers and
heads of churches.  In England, the Malvern Conference
gave the spiritual support for the modern British welfare state.  It is
no coincidence that the most important successes of liberalism came
with the support of powerful religious institutions.

Yes, I know.  Religion’s horrible.  Remind me, again, about the children’s crusade; the religious wars and the inquisition, Galileo’s excommunication, and the Scopes trial.    But I’ve yet to read a serious scholar who argued they weren’t also about resources, personality and urbanization.

Yet while the power of religious institutions has declined,
citizenship has not improved.   The country pays lip service to Martin
Luther King, but the plutocrats read Ayn Rand.  The elites themselves
have been delivered from even paying lip service to Christian virtue,
jettisoning the justice of any kind of restraint.    While the
patriarchy has diminished, evolutionary psychology is now the faith of
young men.   While liberal religion is mocked, it has been replaced with
a much more powerful faith in tax-cuts.   And believing in tax-cuts is
just that:  a faith, a faith that is more powerful than the burdens of
Christian conviction.

I’m skeptical that this is improvement.

The collapse of religious institutions will not necessarily mean
enlightenment or justice.  Instead we may be rewarded with competitive
cynical technocrats, shielded by a cool irreverence, disinterested in
any sort of ideals save the power of the market or the military.  I’m
skeptical that we should be cheery about the Brave New World that may
replace it.

We remain creatures who need hope, meaning and a just imagination to
limit the power of those who consider the restraint of religion
arduous.   Religion provided that language, however insufficiently its
institutions followed its own rules.  The dismantlement of the sacred
and reverence may merely mean more people who worship consumer culture.

Surely, the end of ignorance means the capitulation of some
traditional religious teaching.  Let those particular traditions whither
on the vine.   But it will not mean that superstition and illogic has
been defeated.  Nor will what comes next be an explosion of peace,
charity, or wisdom.   Those will remain rare, the narrow road, the eye
of the needle.  Fortunately, we need only a mustard seed’s worth for the
world to keep moving, for redemption to remain on the horizon.

I trust that the churches may still, in perhaps a much more modest
form, cultivate apostles who can speak truthfully, be charitable to
their opponents, be open to conflict, and willing to change their mind
when proven wrong.    Perhaps we can dispense with ideology, and return
to seeking what wisdom remains in our precarious, broken, and imperfect

Originally posted at at The Divine Latitude


We're already there

The collapse of religious institutions will not necessarily mean enlightenment or justice.  Instead we may be rewarded with competitive cynical technocrats, shielded by a cool irreverence, disinterested in any sort of ideals save the power of the market or the military. ~ Gawain de Leeuw

I hate to startle you but this already exists in this country and has for some time.

The loss of religion is not what we need.  Nor the worship of God in some sacred, meaningful way. But fundamenalists right wing Christianity definitely needs to go.  This is the scurge upon our society and it remains unchecked by any reasonable opposite expression of traditional Christian fatih.

The voices of this distrubed, self-righteous, greedy and power hungry crowd is not matched by liberal voices crying for justice, peace, the care of the poor, the old, the sick.  I rarely see or hear liberal ministers or churches renounce the fundamentalists blathering on and on about "seed" faith, the "prosperity gospel," taking over the government and replacing it with ignorant whitey white notions of power. Or even hear or see them fighting for the disenfranchised and the forgotten.  

John Lennon said years ago at the height of the Beatles popularity that Christianity would die and fall away.  We can only hope he was talking about this awful brand of it called right wing fundamentalism and liberal indifference.